Fujifilm X100VI vs Panasonic Lumix L10
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Announced: May 2026 on the Lumix L10, against Feb 2024 on the X100VI.
- Sensor size: APS-C on the X100VI, against Micro Four Thirds on the Lumix L10.
- Resolution: 40.2 MP on the X100VI, against 20.4 MP on the Lumix L10.
- Native ISO: 100–25,600 on the Lumix L10, against 125–12,800 on the X100VI.
- In-body stabilisation: Yes, 6 stops on the X100VI, against No on the Lumix L10.
- Burst (electronic): 30 fps on the Lumix L10, against 20 fps on the X100VI.
X100VI or Lumix L10: which should you buy?
Choose the X100VI for its sensor size, resolution, in-body stabilisation and fastest shutter (mech.). It leads on 5 specs in all.
Choose the Lumix L10 for its native ISO, burst (electronic), weight (with battery) and battery (CIPA shots).
On paper the X100VI wins more rows (5 to 4); if the Lumix L10's strengths are the ones you shoot with, and its price is lower where you buy, it can still be the better buy.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | $2,000 new $199 used | $1,497.99 new $636 used |
| Overview | ||
| Type | Compact (fixed lens) | Compact (fixed lens) |
| Announced | Feb 2024 | May 2026 (best) |
| US launch priceUS list price when announced, body only. Today's prices are in the offers table. | $1,599 | $1,499 |
| Lens | 35mm (35mm eq.) f/2 | 24–75mm (35mm eq.) f/1.7-2.8 |
| Sensor & image | ||
| Sensor size | APS-C (best) | Micro Four Thirds |
| Sensor type | X-Trans CMOS 5 HR | BSI CMOS |
| Resolution | 40.2 MP (best) | 20.4 MP |
| Native ISO | 125–12,800 | 100–25,600 (best) |
| In-body stabilisation | Yes, 6 stops (best) | No |
| Speed & autofocus | ||
| Burst (mechanical) | 11 fps | 11 fps |
| Burst (electronic) | 20 fps | 30 fps (best) |
| Fastest shutter (mech.) | 1/4,000s (best) | 1/2,000s |
| Fastest shutter (elec.) | 1/180,000s (best) | 1/32,000s |
| AF pointsMakers count points differently, so this is not ranked. | 425 | 779 |
| Subject detectionMakers group subjects differently (Canon's "animal" includes birds), so only having it is ranked. | Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle, Aircraft, Train | Human, Animal, Vehicle, Train, Aircraft |
| Video | ||
| Max resolution | 6.2K | — |
| 4K frame rate | 60p | — |
| 10-bit internal | Yes | Yes |
| Internal raw video | No | No |
| Mic input | Yes | Yes |
| Headphone jack | No | No |
| Viewfinder & screen | ||
| Viewfinder | Hybrid optical/EVF, 3.69M dots | Electronic |
| Rear screen | 3", 1.62M dots | 3" |
| Screen articulation | Tilting | Fully articulating |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Body & battery | ||
| Weight (with battery) | 521 g | 508 g (best) |
| Dimensions (W×H×D) | 128 × 74.8 × 55.3 mm | 127.1 × 73.9 × 66.9 mm |
| Weather sealed | — | No |
| Battery (CIPA shots) | 320 | 420 (best) |
| Card slots | 1 · SD UHS-I | 1 · SD UHS-II |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in flash | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi / Bluetooth | Wi-Fi + Bluetooth | Wi-Fi + Bluetooth |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.
Price history: is the newer one cheaper?
Low light & noise
X100VI
3.0 µm pixels
40.2 MP on a aps-c sensor, ISO up to 12,800
Lumix L10
3.3 µm pixels
20.4 MP on a micro four thirds sensor, ISO up to 25,600
Bigger pixels gather more light each, so they tend to show less noise at high ISO, but sensor design matters as much. For real noise at ISO 6400, these sites measure it:
- Photons to Photos: dynamic range vs ISO ↗Photographic dynamic range measured at every ISO, bodies on one chart
- Photons to Photos: noise vs ISO ↗Read noise at every ISO from lab tests: lower is cleaner in the shadows
- DPReview studio scene ↗The same scene shot by each camera at the ISO you pick, side by side
- DPReview reviews ↗Full reviews with high-ISO samples
- Low-light video tests ↗Real-world high-ISO footage on YouTube
Size, to scale
Front (width × height)
Top (width × depth)