Panasonic Lumix L10 vs Ricoh GR IV
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Announced: May 2026 on the Lumix L10, against Aug 2025 on the GR IV.
- Sensor size: APS-C on the GR IV, against Micro Four Thirds on the Lumix L10.
- Resolution: 25.7 MP on the GR IV, against 20.4 MP on the Lumix L10.
- Native ISO: 100–204,800 on the GR IV, against 100–25,600 on the Lumix L10.
- In-body stabilisation: Yes, 6 stops on the GR IV, against No on the Lumix L10.
- Fastest shutter (mech.): 1/4,000s on the GR IV, against 1/2,000s on the Lumix L10.
Lumix L10 or GR IV: which should you buy?
Choose the Lumix L10 for its 10-bit internal, mic input and battery (CIPA shots).
Choose the GR IV for its sensor size, resolution, native ISO and in-body stabilisation. It leads on 6 specs in all.
On paper the GR IV wins more rows (6 to 3); if the Lumix L10's strengths are the ones you shoot with, and its price is lower where you buy, it can still be the better buy.
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | $1,497.99 new $636 used | $1,599.95 new $1,514.98 used |
| Overview | ||
| Type | Compact (fixed lens) | Compact (fixed lens) |
| Announced | May 2026 (best) | Aug 2025 |
| US launch priceUS list price when announced, body only. Today's prices are in the offers table. | $1,499 | $1,499.95 |
| Lens | 24–75mm (35mm eq.) f/1.7-2.8 | 28mm (35mm eq.) f/2.8 |
| Sensor & image | ||
| Sensor size | Micro Four Thirds | APS-C (best) |
| Sensor type | BSI CMOS | CMOS |
| Resolution | 20.4 MP | 25.7 MP (best) |
| Native ISO | 100–25,600 | 100–204,800 (best) |
| In-body stabilisation | No | Yes, 6 stops (best) |
| Speed & autofocus | ||
| Burst (mechanical) | 11 fps | — |
| Burst (electronic) | 30 fps | — |
| Fastest shutter (mech.) | 1/2,000s | 1/4,000s (best) |
| Fastest shutter (elec.) | 1/32,000s | — |
| AF pointsMakers count points differently, so this is not ranked. | 779 | — |
| Subject detectionMakers group subjects differently (Canon's "animal" includes birds), so only having it is ranked. | Human, Animal, Vehicle, Train, Aircraft | — |
| Video | ||
| Max resolution | — | 1080p |
| 4K frame rate | — | — |
| 10-bit internal | Yes (best) | No |
| Internal raw video | No | No |
| Mic input | Yes (best) | No |
| Headphone jack | No | No |
| Viewfinder & screen | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Rear screen | 3" | 3", 1.04M dots |
| Screen articulation | Fully articulating | Fixed |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Body & battery | ||
| Weight (with battery) | 508 g | 262 g (best) |
| Dimensions (W×H×D) | 127.1 × 73.9 × 66.9 mm | 109.4 × 61.1 × 32.7 mm |
| Weather sealed | No | — |
| Battery (CIPA shots) | 420 (best) | 250 |
| Card slots | 1 · SD UHS-II | 1 · microSD UHS-I + 53GB internal |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in flash | No | No |
| Wi-Fi / Bluetooth | Wi-Fi + Bluetooth | Wi-Fi + Bluetooth |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.
Price history: is the newer one cheaper?
Low light & noise
Lumix L10
3.3 µm pixels
20.4 MP on a micro four thirds sensor, ISO up to 25,600
GR IV
3.8 µm pixels
25.7 MP on a aps-c sensor, ISO up to 204,800
Bigger pixels gather more light each, so they tend to show less noise at high ISO, but sensor design matters as much. For real noise at ISO 6400, these sites measure it:
- Photons to Photos: dynamic range vs ISO ↗Photographic dynamic range measured at every ISO, bodies on one chart
- Photons to Photos: noise vs ISO ↗Read noise at every ISO from lab tests: lower is cleaner in the shadows
- DPReview studio scene ↗The same scene shot by each camera at the ISO you pick, side by side
- DPReview reviews ↗Full reviews with high-ISO samples
- Low-light video tests ↗Real-world high-ISO footage on YouTube
Size, to scale
Front (width × height)
Top (width × depth)

