Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 II ASPH. Power O.I.S. vs Panasonic Lumix G Vario 100-300mm F4.0-5.6 II Power O.I.S.
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Maximum aperture: f/4–5.6 on the Lumix G Vario 100-300mm F4.0-5.6 II Power O.I.S., against f/4–6.3 on the Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 II ASPH. Power O.I.S..
- Aperture blades: 9 on the Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 II ASPH. Power O.I.S., against 7 on the Lumix G Vario 100-300mm F4.0-5.6 II Power O.I.S..
- Closest focus: 1.30 m on the Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 II ASPH. Power O.I.S., against 1.50 m on the Lumix G Vario 100-300mm F4.0-5.6 II Power O.I.S..
- Max magnification: 0.25× on the Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 II ASPH. Power O.I.S., against 0.21× on the Lumix G Vario 100-300mm F4.0-5.6 II Power O.I.S..
- Weight: 520 g on the Lumix G Vario 100-300mm F4.0-5.6 II Power O.I.S., against 985 g on the Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 II ASPH. Power O.I.S..
Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 II ASPH. Power O.I.S. or Lumix G Vario 100-300mm F4.0-5.6 II Power O.I.S.: which should you buy?
Choose the Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 II ASPH. Power O.I.S. for its aperture blades, closest focus and max magnification.
Choose the Lumix G Vario 100-300mm F4.0-5.6 II Power O.I.S. for its maximum aperture and weight.
On paper the Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 II ASPH. Power O.I.S. wins more rows (3 to 2); if the Lumix G Vario 100-300mm F4.0-5.6 II Power O.I.S.'s strengths are the ones you shoot with, and its price is lower where you buy, it can still be the better buy.
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | $1,649.99 new | $747.99 new |
| Optics | ||
| Focal length | 100–400mm | 100–300mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 200–800mm equivalent | 200–600mm equivalent |
| Maximum apertureLower f-number lets in more light. A zoom wins only when it is as bright at both ends. | f/4–6.3 | f/4–5.6 (best) |
| Minimum aperture | f/22 | f/22 |
| Made for | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Elements / groups | 20 / 13 | 17 / 12 |
| Aperture blades | 9 (best) | 7 |
| Closest focus | 1.30 m (best) | 1.50 m |
| Max magnification | 0.25× (best) | 0.21× |
| Focus & handling | ||
| Autofocus | Yes (Linear motor) | Yes |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Weather sealed | Yes | Yes |
| Internal zoom | No | No |
| Aperture ring | No | No |
| Teleconverter compatible | Yes | No |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 985 g | 520 g (best) |
| Diameter × length | 83 × 171.5 mm | 73.6 × 126 mm |
| Filter thread | 72 mm | 67 mm |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.
Price history: is the newer one cheaper?
More comparisons
- Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 II ASPH. Power O.I.S. vs M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS II
- Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 II ASPH. Power O.I.S. vs M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II
- Lumix G Vario 100-300mm F4.0-5.6 II Power O.I.S. vs M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II

