OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II vs Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 II ASPH. Power O.I.S.
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Maximum aperture: f/4–6.3 on the Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 II ASPH. Power O.I.S., against f/4.8–6.7 on the M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II.
- Aperture blades: 9 on the Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 II ASPH. Power O.I.S., against 7 on the M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II.
- Closest focus: 0.90 m on the M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II, against 1.30 m on the Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 II ASPH. Power O.I.S..
- Max magnification: 0.25× on the Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 II ASPH. Power O.I.S., against 0.18× on the M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II.
- Optical stabilisation: Yes on the Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 II ASPH. Power O.I.S., against No on the M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II.
- Weather sealed: Yes on the Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 II ASPH. Power O.I.S., against No on the M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II or Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 II ASPH. Power O.I.S.: which should you buy?
Choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II for its closest focus and weight.
Choose the Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 II ASPH. Power O.I.S. for its maximum aperture, aperture blades, max magnification and optical stabilisation. It leads on 5 specs in all.
On paper the Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 II ASPH. Power O.I.S. wins more rows (5 to 2); if the M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II's strengths are the ones you shoot with, and its price is lower where you buy, it can still be the better buy.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | $549.99 new | $1,649.99 new |
| Optics | ||
| Focal length | 75–300mm | 100–400mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 150–600mm equivalent | 200–800mm equivalent |
| Maximum apertureLower f-number lets in more light. A zoom wins only when it is as bright at both ends. | f/4.8–6.7 | f/4–6.3 (best) |
| Minimum aperture | f/22 | f/22 |
| Made for | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Elements / groups | 18 / 13 | 20 / 13 |
| Aperture blades | 7 | 9 (best) |
| Closest focus | 0.90 m (best) | 1.30 m |
| Max magnification | 0.18× | 0.25× (best) |
| Focus & handling | ||
| Autofocus | Yes (MSC) | Yes (Linear motor) |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes (best) |
| Weather sealed | No | Yes (best) |
| Internal zoom | No | No |
| Aperture ring | No | No |
| Teleconverter compatible | No | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 423 g (best) | 985 g |
| Diameter × length | 69 × 116.5 mm | 83 × 171.5 mm |
| Filter thread | 58 mm | 72 mm |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.
Price history: is the newer one cheaper?
More comparisons
- M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II vs Lumix G Vario 100-300mm F4.0-5.6 II Power O.I.S.
- M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II vs M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS II
- Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 II ASPH. Power O.I.S. vs M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS II
- Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 II ASPH. Power O.I.S. vs Lumix G Vario 100-300mm F4.0-5.6 II Power O.I.S.