Leica Summicron-SL 35 f/2 ASPH. vs Panasonic Lumix S 40mm F2
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Closest focus: 0.24 m on the Summicron-SL 35 f/2 ASPH., against 0.30 m on the Lumix S 40mm F2.
- Max magnification: 0.22× on the Summicron-SL 35 f/2 ASPH., against 0.17× on the Lumix S 40mm F2.
- Weight: 144 g on the Lumix S 40mm F2, against 400 g on the Summicron-SL 35 f/2 ASPH..
Summicron-SL 35 f/2 ASPH. or Lumix S 40mm F2: which should you buy?
Choose the Summicron-SL 35 f/2 ASPH. for its closest focus and max magnification.
Choose the Lumix S 40mm F2 for its weight.
On paper the Summicron-SL 35 f/2 ASPH. wins more rows (2 to 1); if the Lumix S 40mm F2's strengths are the ones you shoot with, and its price is lower where you buy, it can still be the better buy.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | $2,395 new $1,695 used | $397.99 new $350 used |
| Optics | ||
| Focal length | 35mm | 40mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 35mm (full frame) | 40mm (full frame) |
| Maximum apertureLower f-number lets in more light. A zoom wins only when it is as bright at both ends. | f/2 | f/2 |
| Minimum aperture | f/22 | f/22 |
| Made for | Full frame | Full frame |
| Elements / groups | 11 / 9 | 7 / 6 |
| Aperture blades | — | 7 |
| Closest focus | 0.24 m (best) | 0.30 m |
| Max magnification | 0.22× (best) | 0.17× |
| Focus & handling | ||
| Autofocus | Yes (Linear direct drive) | Yes (Stepping motor) |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Weather sealed | Yes | Yes |
| Internal zoom | — | — |
| Aperture ring | No | No |
| Teleconverter compatible | No | No |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 400 g | 144 g (best) |
| Diameter × length | 74.5 × 83 mm | 69.4 × 40.9 mm |
| Filter thread | 67 mm | 62 mm |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.