Fujifilm X100T vs Ricoh GR II
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Announced: Jun 2015 on the GR II, against Sep 2014 on the X100T.
- Resolution: 16.3 MP on the X100T, against 16.2 MP on the GR II.
- Native ISO: 100–25,600 on the GR II, against 200–6,400 on the X100T.
- Burst (mechanical): 6 fps on the X100T, against 4 fps on the GR II.
- Mic input: Yes on the X100T, against No on the GR II.
- Viewfinder: Hybrid optical/EVF, 2.36M dots on the X100T, against None on the GR II.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | $899 used | Not priced in US yet |
| Overview | ||
| Type | Compact (fixed lens) | Compact (fixed lens) |
| Announced | Sep 2014 | Jun 2015 (best) |
| US launch priceUS list price when announced, body only. Today's prices are in the offers table. | $1,299.95 | — |
| Lens | 35mm (35mm eq.) f/2 | 28mm (35mm eq.) f/2.8 |
| Sensor & image | ||
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor type | X-Trans CMOS II | CMOS |
| Resolution | 16.3 MP (best) | 16.2 MP |
| Native ISO | 200–6,400 | 100–25,600 (best) |
| In-body stabilisation | No | No |
| Speed & autofocus | ||
| Burst (mechanical) | 6 fps (best) | 4 fps |
| Burst (electronic) | — | — |
| Fastest shutter (mech.) | 1/4,000s | 1/4,000s |
| Fastest shutter (elec.) | 1/32,000s | — |
| AF pointsMakers count points differently, so this is not ranked. | — | — |
| Subject detectionMakers group subjects differently (Canon's "animal" includes birds), so only having it is ranked. | Human | — |
| Video | ||
| Max resolution | 1080p | 1080p |
| 4K frame rate | — | — |
| 10-bit internal | No | No |
| Internal raw video | No | No |
| Mic input | Yes (best) | No |
| Headphone jack | No | No |
| Viewfinder & screen | ||
| Viewfinder | Hybrid optical/EVF, 2.36M dots (best) | None |
| Rear screen | 3", 1.04M dots | 3", 1.23M dots (best) |
| Screen articulation | Fixed | Fixed |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Body & battery | ||
| Weight (with battery) | 440 g | 251 g (best) |
| Dimensions (W×H×D) | 126.5 × 74.4 × 52.4 mm | 117 × 62.8 × 34.7 mm |
| Weather sealed | No | No |
| Battery (CIPA shots) | 330 (best) | 320 |
| Card slots | 1 · SD UHS-I | 1 · SD UHS-I + 54MB internal |
| USB-C | No | No |
| Built-in flash | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi / Bluetooth | Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.
Low light & noise
X100T
4.8 µm pixels
16.3 MP on a aps-c sensor, ISO up to 6,400
GR II
4.8 µm pixels
16.2 MP on a aps-c sensor, ISO up to 25,600
Bigger pixels gather more light each, so they tend to show less noise at high ISO, but sensor design matters as much. For real noise at ISO 6400, these sites measure it:
- Photons to Photos: dynamic range vs ISO ↗Photographic dynamic range measured at every ISO, bodies on one chart
- Photons to Photos: noise vs ISO ↗Read noise at every ISO from lab tests: lower is cleaner in the shadows
- DPReview studio scene ↗The same scene shot by each camera at the ISO you pick, side by side
- DPReview reviews ↗Full reviews with high-ISO samples
- Low-light video tests ↗Real-world high-ISO footage on YouTube
Size, to scale
Front (width × height)
Top (width × depth)