Fujifilm X-E2S vs Fujifilm X100T
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Announced: Jan 2016 on the X-E2S, against Sep 2014 on the X100T.
- Burst (mechanical): 7 fps on the X-E2S, against 6 fps on the X100T.
- Weight (with battery): 350 g on the X-E2S, against 440 g on the X100T.
- Battery (CIPA shots): 350 on the X-E2S, against 330 on the X100T.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | Not priced in US yet | $899 used |
| Overview | ||
| Type | Mirrorless | Compact (fixed lens) |
| Announced | Jan 2016 (best) | Sep 2014 |
| US launch priceUS list price when announced, body only. Today's prices are in the offers table. | $699 | $1,299.95 |
| Lens | Interchangeable | 35mm (35mm eq.) f/2 |
| Sensor & image | ||
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor type | X-Trans CMOS II | X-Trans CMOS II |
| Resolution | 16.3 MP | 16.3 MP |
| Native ISO | 200–6,400 | 200–6,400 |
| In-body stabilisation | No | No |
| Speed & autofocus | ||
| Burst (mechanical) | 7 fps (best) | 6 fps |
| Burst (electronic) | — | — |
| Fastest shutter (mech.) | 1/4,000s | 1/4,000s |
| Fastest shutter (elec.) | 1/32,000s | 1/32,000s |
| AF pointsMakers count points differently, so this is not ranked. | 77 | — |
| Subject detectionMakers group subjects differently (Canon's "animal" includes birds), so only having it is ranked. | Human | Human |
| Video | ||
| Max resolution | 1080p | 1080p |
| 4K frame rate | — | — |
| 10-bit internal | No | No |
| Internal raw video | No | No |
| Mic input | Yes | Yes |
| Headphone jack | No | No |
| Viewfinder & screen | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic, 2.36M dots | Hybrid optical/EVF, 2.36M dots |
| Rear screen | 3", 1.04M dots | 3", 1.04M dots |
| Screen articulation | Fixed | Fixed |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Body & battery | ||
| Weight (with battery) | 350 g (best) | 440 g |
| Dimensions (W×H×D) | 129 × 74.9 × 37.2 mm | 126.5 × 74.4 × 52.4 mm |
| Weather sealed | No | No |
| Battery (CIPA shots) | 350 (best) | 330 |
| Card slots | 1 · SD | 1 · SD UHS-I |
| USB-C | No | No |
| Built-in flash | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi / Bluetooth | Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.
Low light & noise
X-E2S
4.8 µm pixels
16.3 MP on a aps-c sensor, ISO up to 6,400
X100T
4.8 µm pixels
16.3 MP on a aps-c sensor, ISO up to 6,400
Bigger pixels gather more light each, so they tend to show less noise at high ISO, but sensor design matters as much. For real noise at ISO 6400, these sites measure it:
- Photons to Photos: dynamic range vs ISO ↗Photographic dynamic range measured at every ISO, bodies on one chart
- Photons to Photos: noise vs ISO ↗Read noise at every ISO from lab tests: lower is cleaner in the shadows
- DPReview studio scene ↗The same scene shot by each camera at the ISO you pick, side by side
- DPReview reviews ↗Full reviews with high-ISO samples
- Low-light video tests ↗Real-world high-ISO footage on YouTube
Size, to scale
Front (width × height)
Top (width × depth)