Fujifilm GFX50S II vs Hasselblad 907X 50C
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Announced: Sep 2021 on the GFX50S II, against Aug 2020 on the 907X 50C.
- Resolution: 51.4 MP on the GFX50S II, against 50 MP on the 907X 50C.
- Native ISO: 100–25,600 on the 907X 50C, against 100–12,800 on the GFX50S II.
- In-body stabilisation: Yes, 6.5 stops on the GFX50S II, against No on the 907X 50C.
- Viewfinder: Electronic, 3.69M dots on the GFX50S II, against None on the 907X 50C.
- Weight (with battery): 740 g on the 907X 50C, against 900 g on the GFX50S II.
GFX50S II or 907X 50C: which should you buy?
Choose the GFX50S II for its resolution, in-body stabilisation and viewfinder.
Choose the 907X 50C for its native ISO and weight (with battery).
On paper the GFX50S II wins more rows (3 to 2); if the 907X 50C's strengths are the ones you shoot with, and its price is lower where you buy, it can still be the better buy.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | $3,999.95 new $2,495 used | $6,499 new $4,518.70 used |
| Overview | ||
| Type | Medium format | Medium format |
| Announced | Sep 2021 (best) | Aug 2020 |
| US launch priceUS list price when announced, body only. Today's prices are in the offers table. | $3,999 | $6,399 |
| Lens | Interchangeable | Interchangeable |
| Sensor & image | ||
| Sensor size | Medium format | Medium format |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Resolution | 51.4 MP (best) | 50 MP |
| Native ISO | 100–12,800 | 100–25,600 (best) |
| In-body stabilisation | Yes, 6.5 stops (best) | No |
| Speed & autofocus | ||
| Burst (mechanical) | 3 fps | — |
| Burst (electronic) | 2.2 fps | — |
| Fastest shutter (mech.) | 1/4,000s | — |
| Fastest shutter (elec.) | 1/16,000s | — |
| AF pointsMakers count points differently, so this is not ranked. | 425 | — |
| Subject detectionMakers group subjects differently (Canon's "animal" includes birds), so only having it is ranked. | Human | — |
| Video | ||
| Max resolution | 1080p | — |
| 4K frame rate | — | — |
| 10-bit internal | — | — |
| Internal raw video | No | — |
| Mic input | Yes | — |
| Headphone jack | Yes | — |
| Viewfinder & screen | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic, 3.69M dots (best) | None |
| Rear screen | 3.2", 2.36M dots | 3.2", 2.36M dots |
| Screen articulation | Multi-angle (tilt + flip) | Tilting |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Body & battery | ||
| Weight (with battery) | 900 g | 740 g (best) |
| Dimensions (W×H×D) | 150 × 104.2 × 87.2 mm | — |
| Weather sealed | Yes | — |
| Battery (CIPA shots) | 455 | — |
| Card slots | 2 · SD UHS-II + SD UHS-II | 2 · SD UHS-II + SD UHS-II |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in flash | No | No |
| Wi-Fi / Bluetooth | Wi-Fi + Bluetooth | Wi-Fi |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.
Price history: is the newer one cheaper?
Low light & noise
GFX50S II
5.3 µm pixels
51.4 MP on a medium format sensor, ISO up to 12,800
907X 50C
5.4 µm pixels
50 MP on a medium format sensor, ISO up to 25,600
Bigger pixels gather more light each, so they tend to show less noise at high ISO, but sensor design matters as much. For real noise at ISO 6400, these sites measure it:
- Photons to Photos: dynamic range vs ISO ↗Photographic dynamic range measured at every ISO, bodies on one chart
- Photons to Photos: noise vs ISO ↗Read noise at every ISO from lab tests: lower is cleaner in the shadows
- DPReview studio scene ↗The same scene shot by each camera at the ISO you pick, side by side
- DPReview reviews ↗Full reviews with high-ISO samples
- Low-light video tests ↗Real-world high-ISO footage on YouTube
Size, to scale
We don't have the maker's dimensions for the Hasselblad 907X 50C, so there's nothing to draw to scale.