Tokina atx-m 33mm F1.4 vs Viltrox AF 33mm F1.4
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Weight: 270 g on the AF 33mm F1.4, against 285 g on the atx-m 33mm F1.4.
atx-m 33mm F1.4 or AF 33mm F1.4: which should you buy?
On published specs the atx-m 33mm F1.4 leads the AF 33mm F1.4 nowhere; buy it for its price, its handling or the lenses you already own.
Choose the AF 33mm F1.4 for its weight.
On paper the AF 33mm F1.4 wins more rows (1 to 0); if the atx-m 33mm F1.4's strengths are the ones you shoot with, and its price is lower where you buy, it can still be the better buy.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | Not priced in US yet | $239 new $191.10 used |
| Optics | ||
| Focal length | 33mm | 33mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 50mm equivalent | 50mm equivalent (53mm on Canon) |
| Maximum apertureLower f-number lets in more light. A zoom wins only when it is as bright at both ends. | f/1.4 | f/1.4 |
| Minimum aperture | f/16 | f/16 |
| Made for | APS-C | APS-C |
| Elements / groups | 10 / 9 | 10 / 9 |
| Aperture blades | 9 | 9 |
| Closest focus | 0.40 m | 0.40 m |
| Max magnification | 0.10× | 0.10× |
| Focus & handling | ||
| Autofocus | Yes (ST-M) | Yes (STM) |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Weather sealed | — | — |
| Internal zoom | — | — |
| Aperture ring | Yes | Yes |
| Teleconverter compatible | No | No |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 285 g | 270 g (best) |
| Diameter × length | 65 × 72 mm | 65 × 72 mm |
| Filter thread | 52 mm | 52 mm |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.