Sony E PZ 18-105mm F4 G OSS vs Sony E PZ 18-110mm F4 G OSS
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Closest focus: 0.40 m on the E PZ 18-110mm F4 G OSS, against 0.45 m on the E PZ 18-105mm F4 G OSS.
- Max magnification: 0.12× on the E PZ 18-110mm F4 G OSS, against 0.11× on the E PZ 18-105mm F4 G OSS.
- Weather sealed: Yes on the E PZ 18-110mm F4 G OSS, against No on the E PZ 18-105mm F4 G OSS.
- Aperture ring: Yes on the E PZ 18-110mm F4 G OSS, against No on the E PZ 18-105mm F4 G OSS.
- Weight: 427 g on the E PZ 18-105mm F4 G OSS, against 1,105 g on the E PZ 18-110mm F4 G OSS.
E PZ 18-105mm F4 G OSS or E PZ 18-110mm F4 G OSS: which should you buy?
Choose the E PZ 18-105mm F4 G OSS for its weight.
Choose the E PZ 18-110mm F4 G OSS for its closest focus, max magnification, weather sealed and aperture ring.
On paper the E PZ 18-110mm F4 G OSS wins more rows (4 to 1); if the E PZ 18-105mm F4 G OSS's strengths are the ones you shoot with, and its price is lower where you buy, it can still be the better buy.
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | $699 new | $2,963 new $1,369.99 used |
| Optics | ||
| Focal length | 18–105mm | 18–110mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 27–158mm equivalent | 27–165mm equivalent |
| Maximum apertureLower f-number lets in more light. A zoom wins only when it is as bright at both ends. | f/4 | f/4 |
| Minimum aperture | f/22 | f/22 |
| Made for | APS-C | APS-C |
| Elements / groups | 16 / 12 | 18 / 15 |
| Aperture blades | 7 | 7 |
| Closest focus | 0.45 m | 0.40 m (best) |
| Max magnification | 0.11× | 0.12× (best) |
| Focus & handling | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Weather sealed | No | Yes (best) |
| Internal zoom | Yes | Yes |
| Aperture ring | No | Yes (best) |
| Teleconverter compatible | No | No |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 427 g (best) | 1,105 g |
| Diameter × length | 78 × 110 mm | 110 × 167.5 mm |
| Filter thread | 72 mm | 95 mm |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.

