Sony E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS vs Sony E PZ 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 OSS
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Maximum aperture: f/3.5–5.6 on the E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS, against f/3.5–6.3 on the E PZ 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 OSS.
- Closest focus: 0.30 m on the E PZ 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 OSS, against 0.45 m on the E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS.
- Max magnification: 0.35× on the E PZ 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 OSS, against 0.29× on the E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS.
- Weight: 325 g on the E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS, against 649 g on the E PZ 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 OSS.
E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS or E PZ 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 OSS: which should you buy?
Choose the E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS for its maximum aperture and weight.
Choose the E PZ 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 OSS for its closest focus and max magnification.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | $373 new $299.99 used | Not priced in US yet |
| Optics | ||
| Focal length | 18–135mm | 18–200mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 27–203mm equivalent | 27–300mm equivalent |
| Maximum apertureLower f-number lets in more light. A zoom wins only when it is as bright at both ends. | f/3.5–5.6 (best) | f/3.5–6.3 |
| Minimum aperture | f/22 | f/22 |
| Made for | APS-C | APS-C |
| Elements / groups | 16 / 12 | 17 / 12 |
| Aperture blades | 7 | 7 |
| Closest focus | 0.45 m | 0.30 m (best) |
| Max magnification | 0.29× | 0.35× (best) |
| Focus & handling | ||
| Autofocus | Yes (Linear) | Yes |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Weather sealed | No | No |
| Internal zoom | — | — |
| Aperture ring | No | No |
| Teleconverter compatible | No | No |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 325 g (best) | 649 g |
| Diameter × length | 67.2 × 88 mm | 93.2 × 99 mm |
| Filter thread | 55 mm | 67 mm |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.