Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS vs Sony E PZ 10-20mm F4 G
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Closest focus: 0.13 m on the E PZ 10-20mm F4 G, against 0.25 m on the E 10-18mm F4 OSS.
- Max magnification: 0.18× on the E PZ 10-20mm F4 G, against 0.10× on the E 10-18mm F4 OSS.
- Optical stabilisation: Yes on the E 10-18mm F4 OSS, against No on the E PZ 10-20mm F4 G.
- Weather sealed: Yes on the E PZ 10-20mm F4 G, against No on the E 10-18mm F4 OSS.
- Internal zoom: Yes on the E PZ 10-20mm F4 G, against No on the E 10-18mm F4 OSS.
- Weight: 178 g on the E PZ 10-20mm F4 G, against 225 g on the E 10-18mm F4 OSS.
E 10-18mm F4 OSS or E PZ 10-20mm F4 G: which should you buy?
Choose the E 10-18mm F4 OSS for its optical stabilisation.
Choose the E PZ 10-20mm F4 G for its closest focus, max magnification, weather sealed and internal zoom. It leads on 5 specs in all.
On paper the E PZ 10-20mm F4 G wins more rows (5 to 1); if the E 10-18mm F4 OSS's strengths are the ones you shoot with, and its price is lower where you buy, it can still be the better buy.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | $898 new $314.99 used | $848 new $725.95 used |
| Optics | ||
| Focal length | 10–18mm | 10–20mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 15–27mm equivalent | 15–30mm equivalent |
| Maximum apertureLower f-number lets in more light. A zoom wins only when it is as bright at both ends. | f/4 | f/4 |
| Minimum aperture | f/22 | f/22 |
| Made for | APS-C | APS-C |
| Elements / groups | 10 / 8 | 11 / 8 |
| Aperture blades | 7 | 7 |
| Closest focus | 0.25 m | 0.13 m (best) |
| Max magnification | 0.10× | 0.18× (best) |
| Focus & handling | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes (Linear) |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes (best) | No |
| Weather sealed | No | Yes (best) |
| Internal zoom | No | Yes (best) |
| Aperture ring | No | No |
| Teleconverter compatible | No | No |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 225 g | 178 g (best) |
| Diameter × length | 70 × 63.5 mm | 69.8 × 55 mm |
| Filter thread | 62 mm | 62 mm |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.