Skip to content
United States prices

Sigma 20-200mm F3.5-6.3 DG | Contemporary vs Sony FE 24-240mm F3.5-6.3 OSS

Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.

Key differences

  • Aperture blades: 9 on the 20-200mm F3.5-6.3 DG | Contemporary, against 7 on the FE 24-240mm F3.5-6.3 OSS.
  • Closest focus: 0.25 m on the 20-200mm F3.5-6.3 DG | Contemporary, against 0.50 m on the FE 24-240mm F3.5-6.3 OSS.
  • Max magnification: 0.50× on the 20-200mm F3.5-6.3 DG | Contemporary, against 0.27× on the FE 24-240mm F3.5-6.3 OSS.
  • Optical stabilisation: Yes on the FE 24-240mm F3.5-6.3 OSS, against No on the 20-200mm F3.5-6.3 DG | Contemporary.
  • Weight: 550 g on the 20-200mm F3.5-6.3 DG | Contemporary, against 780 g on the FE 24-240mm F3.5-6.3 OSS.

20-200mm F3.5-6.3 DG | Contemporary or FE 24-240mm F3.5-6.3 OSS: which should you buy?

Choose the 20-200mm F3.5-6.3 DG | Contemporary for its aperture blades, closest focus, max magnification and weight.

Choose the FE 24-240mm F3.5-6.3 OSS for its optical stabilisation.

On paper the 20-200mm F3.5-6.3 DG | Contemporary wins more rows (4 to 1); if the FE 24-240mm F3.5-6.3 OSS's strengths are the ones you shoot with, and its price is lower where you buy, it can still be the better buy.

Sigma 20-200mm F3.5-6.3 DG | Contemporary
Sigma 20-200mm F3.5-6.3 DG | Contemporary
Sony FE 24-240mm F3.5-6.3 OSS
Sony FE 24-240mm F3.5-6.3 OSS
Lowest price today

$899 new

$754.95 used

$948 new

$1,075.95 used

Optics
Focal length20–200mm24–240mm
35mm equivalent20–200mm (full frame)24–240mm (full frame)
Maximum apertureLower f-number lets in more light. A zoom wins only when it is as bright at both ends.f/3.5–6.3f/3.5–6.3
Minimum aperturef/22f/22
Made forFull frameFull frame
Elements / groups18 / 1417 / 12
Aperture blades9 (best)7
Closest focus0.25 m (best)0.50 m
Max magnification0.50× (best)0.27×
Focus & handling
AutofocusYes (HLA)Yes (Linear)
Optical stabilisationNoYes (best)
Weather sealedYesYes
Internal zoomNoNo
Aperture ringNoNo
Teleconverter compatibleNoNo
Size & weight
Weight550 g (best)780 g
Diameter × length77.2 × 115.5 mm80.5 × 118.5 mm
Filter thread72 mm72 mm

Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.

Price history: is the newer one cheaper?

More comparisons

Add a third to this comparison →