Sigma 150-600mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS | Sports vs Sony FE 200-600mm F5.6-6.3 G OSS
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Maximum aperture: f/5–6.3 on the 150-600mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS | Sports, against f/5.6–6.3 on the FE 200-600mm F5.6-6.3 G OSS.
- Aperture blades: 11 on the FE 200-600mm F5.6-6.3 G OSS, against 9 on the 150-600mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS | Sports.
- Closest focus: 0.58 m on the 150-600mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS | Sports, against 2.40 m on the FE 200-600mm F5.6-6.3 G OSS.
- Max magnification: 0.34× on the 150-600mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS | Sports, against 0.20× on the FE 200-600mm F5.6-6.3 G OSS.
- Internal zoom: Yes on the FE 200-600mm F5.6-6.3 G OSS, against No on the 150-600mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS | Sports.
- Weight: 2,100 g on the 150-600mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS | Sports, against 2,115 g on the FE 200-600mm F5.6-6.3 G OSS.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | Not priced in US yet | $1,977 new |
| Optics | ||
| Focal length | 150–600mm | 200–600mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 150–600mm (full frame) | 200–600mm (full frame) |
| Maximum apertureLower f-number lets in more light. A zoom wins only when it is as bright at both ends. | f/5–6.3 (best) | f/5.6–6.3 |
| Minimum aperture | f/22 | f/32 |
| Made for | Full frame | Full frame |
| Elements / groups | 25 / 15 | 24 / 17 |
| Aperture blades | 9 | 11 (best) |
| Closest focus | 0.58 m (best) | 2.40 m |
| Max magnification | 0.34× (best) | 0.20× |
| Focus & handling | ||
| Autofocus | Yes (Stepping motor) | Yes (DDSSM) |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Weather sealed | Yes | Yes |
| Internal zoom | No | Yes (best) |
| Aperture ring | No | No |
| Teleconverter compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 2,100 g (best) | 2,115 g |
| Diameter × length | 109.4 × 263.6 mm | 111.5 × 318 mm |
| Filter thread | 95 mm | 95 mm |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.