Sigma 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro | Art vs Sony FE 100mm F2.8 Macro GM OSS
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Aperture blades: 11 on the FE 100mm F2.8 Macro GM OSS, against 9 on the 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro | Art.
- Closest focus: 0.26 m on the FE 100mm F2.8 Macro GM OSS, against 0.29 m on the 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro | Art.
- Max magnification: 1.40× on the FE 100mm F2.8 Macro GM OSS, against 1× on the 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro | Art.
- Optical stabilisation: Yes on the FE 100mm F2.8 Macro GM OSS, against No on the 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro | Art.
- Weight: 646 g on the FE 100mm F2.8 Macro GM OSS, against 715 g on the 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro | Art.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | Not priced in US yet | $1,498 new |
| Optics | ||
| Focal length | 105mm | 100mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 105mm (full frame) | 100mm (full frame) |
| Maximum apertureLower f-number lets in more light. A zoom wins only when it is as bright at both ends. | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Minimum aperture | f/22 | f/22 |
| Made for | Full frame | Full frame |
| Elements / groups | 17 / 12 | 17 / 13 |
| Aperture blades | 9 | 11 (best) |
| Closest focus | 0.29 m | 0.26 m (best) |
| Max magnification | 1× | 1.40× (best) |
| Focus & handling | ||
| Autofocus | Yes (HSM) | Yes (XD Linear) |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes (best) |
| Weather sealed | Yes | Yes |
| Internal zoom | — | — |
| Aperture ring | Yes | Yes |
| Teleconverter compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 715 g | 646 g (best) |
| Diameter × length | 74 × 133.6 mm | 81.4 × 147.9 mm |
| Filter thread | 62 mm | 67 mm |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.