Skip to content
United States prices

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II vs Sony α6500

Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.

Key differences

  • Announced: Nov 2016 on the E-M1 Mark II, against Oct 2016 on the α6500.
  • Sensor size: APS-C on the α6500, against Micro Four Thirds on the E-M1 Mark II.
  • Resolution: 24.2 MP on the α6500, against 20.4 MP on the E-M1 Mark II.
  • In-body stabilisation: Yes, 6.5 stops on the E-M1 Mark II, against Yes, 5 stops on the α6500.
  • Burst (mechanical): 15 fps on the E-M1 Mark II, against 11 fps on the α6500.
  • Burst (electronic): 60 fps on the E-M1 Mark II, against 3 fps on the α6500.
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Sony α6500
Sony α6500
Lowest price today

Not priced in US yet

$1,599 new

Overview
TypeMirrorlessMirrorless
AnnouncedNov 2016 (best)Oct 2016
US launch priceUS list price when announced, body only. Today's prices are in the offers table.$1,999.99$1,400
LensInterchangeableInterchangeable
Sensor & image
Sensor sizeMicro Four ThirdsAPS-C (best)
Sensor typeLive MOSCMOS
Resolution20.4 MP24.2 MP (best)
Native ISO200–25,600100–25,600
In-body stabilisationYes, 6.5 stops (best)Yes, 5 stops
Speed & autofocus
Burst (mechanical)15 fps (best)11 fps
Burst (electronic)60 fps (best)3 fps
Fastest shutter (mech.)1/8,000s (best)1/4,000s
Fastest shutter (elec.)1/32,000s—
AF pointsMakers count points differently, so this is not ranked.121425
Subject detectionMakers group subjects differently (Canon's "animal" includes birds), so only having it is ranked.HumanHuman
Video
Max resolution4K4K
4K frame rate30p30p
10-bit internalNoNo
Internal raw videoNoNo
Mic inputYesYes
Headphone jackYes (best)No
Viewfinder & screen
ViewfinderElectronic, 2.36M dotsElectronic, 2.36M dots
Rear screen3", 1.04M dots (best)3", 0.92M dots
Screen articulationFully articulatingTilting
TouchscreenYesYes
Body & battery
Weight (with battery)574 g453 g (best)
Dimensions (W×H×D)134.1 × 90.9 × 68.9 mm120 × 66.9 × 64.4 mm
Weather sealedYesYes
Battery (CIPA shots)440 (best)350
Card slots2 · SD UHS-II + SD UHS-I (best)1 · SD UHS-I / Memory Stick Pro Duo
USB-CYes (best)No
Built-in flashNoYes
Wi-Fi / BluetoothWi-FiWi-Fi + Bluetooth

Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.

Low light & noise

E-M1 Mark II

3.3 µm pixels

20.4 MP on a micro four thirds sensor, ISO up to 25,600

α6500

3.9 µm pixels

24.2 MP on a aps-c sensor, ISO up to 25,600

Bigger pixels gather more light each, so they tend to show less noise at high ISO, but sensor design matters as much. For real noise at ISO 6400, these sites measure it:

Size, to scale

Front (width × height)

Top (width × depth)

E-M1 Mark II: 134.1 × 90.9 × 68.9 mm, 574 gα6500: 120 × 66.9 × 64.4 mm, 453 g

Add a third to this comparison →