Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-180mm f/2.8 vs Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Closest focus: 0.27 m on the NIKKOR Z 70-180mm f/2.8, against 0.50 m on the NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S.
- Max magnification: 0.48× on the NIKKOR Z 70-180mm f/2.8, against 0.20× on the NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S.
- Optical stabilisation: Yes on the NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S, against No on the NIKKOR Z 70-180mm f/2.8.
- Internal zoom: Yes on the NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S, against No on the NIKKOR Z 70-180mm f/2.8.
- Weight: 795 g on the NIKKOR Z 70-180mm f/2.8, against 1,360 g on the NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | $1,296.95 new | $2,396.95 new $2,649 used |
| Optics | ||
| Focal length | 70–180mm | 70–200mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 70–180mm (full frame) | 70–200mm (full frame) |
| Maximum apertureLower f-number lets in more light. A zoom wins only when it is as bright at both ends. | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Minimum aperture | f/22 | f/22 |
| Made for | Full frame | Full frame |
| Elements / groups | 19 / 14 | 21 / 18 |
| Aperture blades | 9 | 9 |
| Closest focus | 0.27 m (best) | 0.50 m |
| Max magnification | 0.48× (best) | 0.20× |
| Focus & handling | ||
| Autofocus | Yes (STM) | Yes (STM) |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes (best) |
| Weather sealed | Yes | Yes |
| Internal zoom | No | Yes (best) |
| Aperture ring | No | No |
| Teleconverter compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 795 g (best) | 1,360 g |
| Diameter × length | 83.5 × 151 mm | 89 × 220 mm |
| Filter thread | 67 mm | 77 mm |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.