Skip to content
United States prices

Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.4 vs Viltrox AF 50mm F1.4 Pro

Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.

Key differences

  • Aperture blades: 11 on the AF 50mm F1.4 Pro, against 9 on the NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.4.
  • Closest focus: 0.37 m on the NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.4, against 0.45 m on the AF 50mm F1.4 Pro.
  • Max magnification: 0.17× on the NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.4, against 0.14× on the AF 50mm F1.4 Pro.
  • Aperture ring: Yes on the AF 50mm F1.4 Pro, against No on the NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.4.
  • Weight: 420 g on the NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.4, against 800 g on the AF 50mm F1.4 Pro.

NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.4 or AF 50mm F1.4 Pro: which should you buy?

Choose the NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.4 for its closest focus, max magnification and weight.

Choose the AF 50mm F1.4 Pro for its aperture blades and aperture ring.

On paper the NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.4 wins more rows (3 to 2); if the AF 50mm F1.4 Pro's strengths are the ones you shoot with, and its price is lower where you buy, it can still be the better buy.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.4
Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.4
Viltrox AF 50mm F1.4 Pro
Viltrox AF 50mm F1.4 Pro
Lowest price today

$546.95 new

$499 new

$539.80 used

Optics
Focal length50mm50mm
35mm equivalent50mm (full frame)50mm (full frame)
Maximum apertureLower f-number lets in more light. A zoom wins only when it is as bright at both ends.f/1.4f/1.4
Minimum aperturef/16f/16
Made forFull frameFull frame
Elements / groups10 / 715 / 11
Aperture blades911 (best)
Closest focus0.37 m (best)0.45 m
Max magnification0.17× (best)0.14×
Focus & handling
AutofocusYes (STM)Yes (HyperVCM)
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Weather sealedYesYes
Internal zoom——
Aperture ringNoYes (best)
Teleconverter compatibleNoNo
Size & weight
Weight420 g (best)800 g
Diameter × length74.5 × 86.5 mm84.5 × 111 mm
Filter thread62 mm77 mm

Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.

Price history: is the newer one cheaper?

More comparisons

Add a third to this comparison →