Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 vs Tamron 16-30mm F/2.8 Di III VXD G2
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Weight: 440 g on the 16-30mm F/2.8 Di III VXD G2, against 450 g on the NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8.
NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 or 16-30mm F/2.8 Di III VXD G2: which should you buy?
On published specs the NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 leads the 16-30mm F/2.8 Di III VXD G2 nowhere; buy it for its price, its handling or the lenses you already own.
Choose the 16-30mm F/2.8 Di III VXD G2 for its weight.
On paper the 16-30mm F/2.8 Di III VXD G2 wins more rows (1 to 0); if the NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8's strengths are the ones you shoot with, and its price is lower where you buy, it can still be the better buy.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | $1,046.95 new | $879 new $695 used |
| Optics | ||
| Focal length | 17–28mm | 16–30mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 17–28mm (full frame) | 16–30mm (full frame) |
| Maximum apertureLower f-number lets in more light. A zoom wins only when it is as bright at both ends. | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Minimum aperture | f/22 | f/16 |
| Made for | Full frame | Full frame |
| Elements / groups | 13 / 11 | 16 / 12 |
| Aperture blades | 9 | 9 |
| Closest focus | 0.19 m | 0.19 m |
| Max magnification | 0.19× | 0.19× |
| Focus & handling | ||
| Autofocus | Yes (STM) | Yes (VXD) |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Weather sealed | Yes | Yes |
| Internal zoom | Yes | Yes |
| Aperture ring | No | No |
| Teleconverter compatible | No | No |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 450 g | 440 g (best) |
| Diameter × length | 75 × 101 mm | 74.8 × 101.8 mm |
| Filter thread | 67 mm | 67 mm |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.