Skip to content
United States prices

Leica Noctilux-M 35 f/1.2 ASPH. vs Leica Summilux-M 35 f/1.4 ASPH.

Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.

Key differences

  • Maximum aperture: f/1.2 on the Noctilux-M 35 f/1.2 ASPH., against f/1.4 on the Summilux-M 35 f/1.4 ASPH..
  • Closest focus: 0.40 m on the Summilux-M 35 f/1.4 ASPH., against 0.50 m on the Noctilux-M 35 f/1.2 ASPH..
  • Max magnification: 0.11× on the Summilux-M 35 f/1.4 ASPH., against 0.09× on the Noctilux-M 35 f/1.2 ASPH..
  • Weight: 338 g on the Summilux-M 35 f/1.4 ASPH., against 416 g on the Noctilux-M 35 f/1.2 ASPH..

Noctilux-M 35 f/1.2 ASPH. or Summilux-M 35 f/1.4 ASPH.: which should you buy?

Choose the Noctilux-M 35 f/1.2 ASPH. for its maximum aperture.

Choose the Summilux-M 35 f/1.4 ASPH. for its closest focus, max magnification and weight.

On paper the Summilux-M 35 f/1.4 ASPH. wins more rows (3 to 1); if the Noctilux-M 35 f/1.2 ASPH.'s strengths are the ones you shoot with, and its price is lower where you buy, it can still be the better buy.

Leica Noctilux-M 35 f/1.2 ASPH.
Leica Noctilux-M 35 f/1.2 ASPH.
Leica Summilux-M 35 f/1.4 ASPH.
Leica Summilux-M 35 f/1.4 ASPH.
Lowest price today

$9,650 new

$5,995 new

$3,695 used

Optics
Focal length35mm35mm
35mm equivalent35mm (full frame)35mm (full frame)
Maximum apertureLower f-number lets in more light. A zoom wins only when it is as bright at both ends.f/1.2 (best)f/1.4
Minimum aperturef/16f/16
Made forFull frameFull frame
Elements / groups10 / 59 / 5
Aperture blades1111
Closest focus0.50 m0.40 m (best)
Max magnification0.09×0.11× (best)
Focus & handling
AutofocusManual focusManual focus
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Weather sealed——
Internal zoom——
Aperture ringYesYes
Teleconverter compatibleNoNo
Size & weight
Weight416 g338 g (best)
Diameter × length64.6 × 50.2 mm58 × 46 mm
Filter thread49 mm46 mm

Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.

Price history: is the newer one cheaper?

Add a third to this comparison →