Leica M10-P vs Leica M11-P
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Announced: Oct 2023 on the M11-P, against Aug 2018 on the M10-P.
- Resolution: 60.3 MP on the M11-P, against 24 MP on the M10-P.
- Burst (mechanical): 5 fps on the M10-P, against 4.5 fps on the M11-P.
- Rear screen: 2.95", 2.33M dots on the M11-P, against 3", 1.04M dots on the M10-P.
- Weight (with battery): 530 g on the M11-P, against 675 g on the M10-P.
- Battery (CIPA shots): 700 on the M11-P, against 210 on the M10-P.
M10-P or M11-P: which should you buy?
Choose the M10-P for its burst (mechanical).
Choose the M11-P for its resolution, rear screen, weight (with battery) and battery (CIPA shots). It leads on 5 specs in all.
On paper the M11-P wins more rows (5 to 1); if the M10-P's strengths are the ones you shoot with, and its price is lower where you buy, it can still be the better buy.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | $7,795 new | $9,669.95 new $8,500 used |
| Overview | ||
| Type | Rangefinder | Rangefinder |
| Announced | Aug 2018 | Oct 2023 (best) |
| US launch priceUS list price when announced, body only. Today's prices are in the offers table. | $7,995 | $9,195 |
| Lens | Interchangeable | Interchangeable |
| Sensor & image | ||
| Sensor size | Full frame | Full frame |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI CMOS |
| Resolution | 24 MP | 60.3 MP (best) |
| Native ISO | 100–50,000 | 64–50,000 |
| In-body stabilisation | No | No |
| Speed & autofocus | ||
| Burst (mechanical) | 5 fps (best) | 4.5 fps |
| Burst (electronic) | — | — |
| Fastest shutter (mech.) | 1/4,000s | 1/4,000s |
| Fastest shutter (elec.) | — | 1/16,000s |
| AF pointsMakers count points differently, so this is not ranked. | — | — |
| Subject detectionMakers group subjects differently (Canon's "animal" includes birds), so only having it is ranked. | — | — |
| Video | ||
| Max resolution | — | — |
| 4K frame rate | — | — |
| 10-bit internal | — | — |
| Internal raw video | — | — |
| Mic input | No | No |
| Headphone jack | No | No |
| Viewfinder & screen | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical | Optical |
| Rear screen | 3", 1.04M dots | 2.95", 2.33M dots (best) |
| Screen articulation | Fixed | Fixed |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Body & battery | ||
| Weight (with battery) | 675 g | 530 g (best) |
| Dimensions (W×H×D) | 139 × 80 × 38.5 mm | 139 × 80 × 38.5 mm |
| Weather sealed | — | — |
| Battery (CIPA shots) | 210 | 700 (best) |
| Card slots | 1 · SD | 1 · SD UHS-II + 256GB internal |
| USB-C | No | Yes (best) |
| Built-in flash | No | No |
| Wi-Fi / Bluetooth | Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi + Bluetooth |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.
Price history: is the newer one cheaper?
Low light & noise
M10-P
6.0 µm pixels
24 MP on a full frame sensor, ISO up to 50,000
M11-P
3.8 µm pixels
60.3 MP on a full frame sensor, ISO up to 50,000
Bigger pixels gather more light each, so they tend to show less noise at high ISO, but sensor design matters as much. For real noise at ISO 6400, these sites measure it:
- Photons to Photos: dynamic range vs ISO ↗Photographic dynamic range measured at every ISO, bodies on one chart
- Photons to Photos: noise vs ISO ↗Read noise at every ISO from lab tests: lower is cleaner in the shadows
- DPReview studio scene ↗The same scene shot by each camera at the ISO you pick, side by side
- DPReview reviews ↗Full reviews with high-ISO samples
- Low-light video tests ↗Real-world high-ISO footage on YouTube
Size, to scale
Front (width × height)
Top (width × depth)