Fujifilm XF 23mm F1.4 R LM WR vs Tokina atx-m 23mm F1.4
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Closest focus: 0.19 m on the XF 23mm F1.4 R LM WR, against 0.30 m on the atx-m 23mm F1.4.
- Max magnification: 0.20× on the XF 23mm F1.4 R LM WR, against 0.10× on the atx-m 23mm F1.4.
- Weight: 276 g on the atx-m 23mm F1.4, against 375 g on the XF 23mm F1.4 R LM WR.
XF 23mm F1.4 R LM WR or atx-m 23mm F1.4: which should you buy?
Choose the XF 23mm F1.4 R LM WR for its closest focus and max magnification.
Choose the atx-m 23mm F1.4 for its weight.
On paper the XF 23mm F1.4 R LM WR wins more rows (2 to 1); if the atx-m 23mm F1.4's strengths are the ones you shoot with, and its price is lower where you buy, it can still be the better buy.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | $999 new $704.99 used | Not priced in US yet |
| Optics | ||
| Focal length | 23mm | 23mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 35mm equivalent | 35mm equivalent |
| Maximum apertureLower f-number lets in more light. A zoom wins only when it is as bright at both ends. | f/1.4 | f/1.4 |
| Minimum aperture | f/16 | f/16 |
| Made for | APS-C | APS-C |
| Elements / groups | 15 / 10 | 11 / 10 |
| Aperture blades | 9 | 9 |
| Closest focus | 0.19 m (best) | 0.30 m |
| Max magnification | 0.20× (best) | 0.10× |
| Focus & handling | ||
| Autofocus | Yes (Linear) | Yes (ST-M) |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Weather sealed | Yes | — |
| Internal zoom | — | — |
| Aperture ring | Yes | Yes |
| Teleconverter compatible | No | No |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 375 g | 276 g (best) |
| Diameter × length | 67 × 77.8 mm | 65 × 72 mm |
| Filter thread | 58 mm | 52 mm |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.