Fujifilm XF 16mm F1.4 R WR vs Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN | Contemporary
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Closest focus: 0.15 m on the XF 16mm F1.4 R WR, against 0.25 m on the 16mm F1.4 DC DN | Contemporary.
- Max magnification: 0.21× on the XF 16mm F1.4 R WR, against 0.10× on the 16mm F1.4 DC DN | Contemporary.
- Aperture ring: Yes on the XF 16mm F1.4 R WR, against No on the 16mm F1.4 DC DN | Contemporary.
- Weight: 375 g on the XF 16mm F1.4 R WR, against 415 g on the 16mm F1.4 DC DN | Contemporary.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | $1,099 new $495 used | Not priced in US yet |
| Optics | ||
| Focal length | 16mm | 16mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 24mm equivalent | 24mm equivalent (26mm on Canon, 32mm on Micro Four Thirds) |
| Maximum apertureLower f-number lets in more light. A zoom wins only when it is as bright at both ends. | f/1.4 | f/1.4 |
| Minimum aperture | f/16 | f/16 |
| Made for | APS-C | APS-C |
| Elements / groups | 13 / 11 | 16 / 13 |
| Aperture blades | 9 | 9 |
| Closest focus | 0.15 m (best) | 0.25 m |
| Max magnification | 0.21× (best) | 0.10× |
| Focus & handling | ||
| Autofocus | Yes (DC Coreless Motor) | Yes (Stepping motor) |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Weather sealed | Yes | — |
| Internal zoom | — | — |
| Aperture ring | Yes (best) | No |
| Teleconverter compatible | No | No |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 375 g (best) | 415 g |
| Diameter × length | 73.4 × 73 mm | 72.2 × 90.3 mm |
| Filter thread | 67 mm | 67 mm |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.