Fujifilm X-T5 vs Sony α6700
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Announced: Jul 2023 on the α6700, against Nov 2022 on the X-T5.
- Resolution: 40.2 MP on the X-T5, against 26 MP on the α6700.
- Native ISO: 100–32,000 on the α6700, against 125–12,800 on the X-T5.
- In-body stabilisation: Yes, 7 stops on the X-T5, against Yes, 5 stops on the α6700.
- Burst (mechanical): 15 fps on the X-T5, against 11 fps on the α6700.
- Burst (electronic): 20 fps on the X-T5, against 11 fps on the α6700.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | $1,999 new | $1,495 new |
| Overview | ||
| Type | Mirrorless | Mirrorless |
| Announced | Nov 2022 | Jul 2023 (best) |
| US launch priceUS list price when announced, body only. Today's prices are in the offers table. | $1,699 | $1,399 |
| Lens | Interchangeable | Interchangeable |
| Sensor & image | ||
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor type | X-Trans CMOS 5 HR | BSI CMOS |
| Resolution | 40.2 MP (best) | 26 MP |
| Native ISO | 125–12,800 | 100–32,000 (best) |
| In-body stabilisation | Yes, 7 stops (best) | Yes, 5 stops |
| Speed & autofocus | ||
| Burst (mechanical) | 15 fps (best) | 11 fps |
| Burst (electronic) | 20 fps (best) | 11 fps |
| Fastest shutter (mech.) | 1/8,000s (best) | 1/4,000s |
| Fastest shutter (elec.) | 1/180,000s (best) | 1/8,000s |
| AF pointsMakers count points differently, so this is not ranked. | 425 | 759 |
| Subject detectionMakers group subjects differently (Canon's "animal" includes birds), so only having it is ranked. | Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle, Aircraft, Train | Human, Animal, Bird, Insect, Vehicle, Train, Aircraft |
| Video | ||
| Max resolution | 6.2K (best) | 4K |
| 4K frame rate | 60p | 120p (best) |
| 10-bit internal | Yes | Yes |
| Internal raw video | No | No |
| Mic input | Yes | Yes |
| Headphone jack | No | Yes (best) |
| Viewfinder & screen | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic, 3.69M dots (best) | Electronic, 2.36M dots |
| Rear screen | 3", 1.84M dots (best) | 3", 1.04M dots |
| Screen articulation | Multi-angle (tilt + flip) | Fully articulating |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Body & battery | ||
| Weight (with battery) | 557 g | 493 g (best) |
| Dimensions (W×H×D) | 129.5 × 91 × 63.8 mm | 122 × 69 × 75.1 mm |
| Weather sealed | Yes | Yes |
| Battery (CIPA shots) | 580 (best) | 570 |
| Card slots | 2 · SD UHS-II + SD UHS-II (best) | 1 · SD UHS-II |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in flash | No | No |
| Wi-Fi / Bluetooth | Wi-Fi + Bluetooth | Wi-Fi + Bluetooth |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.
Low light & noise
X-T5
3.0 µm pixels
40.2 MP on a aps-c sensor, ISO up to 12,800
α6700
3.8 µm pixels
26 MP on a aps-c sensor, ISO up to 32,000
Bigger pixels gather more light each, so they tend to show less noise at high ISO, but sensor design matters as much. For real noise at ISO 6400, these sites measure it:
- Photons to Photos: dynamic range vs ISO ↗Photographic dynamic range measured at every ISO, bodies on one chart
- Photons to Photos: noise vs ISO ↗Read noise at every ISO from lab tests: lower is cleaner in the shadows
- DPReview studio scene ↗The same scene shot by each camera at the ISO you pick, side by side
- DPReview reviews ↗Full reviews with high-ISO samples
- Low-light video tests ↗Real-world high-ISO footage on YouTube
Size, to scale
Front (width × height)
Top (width × depth)