Fujifilm X-Pro2 vs Fujifilm X-T2
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Announced: Jul 2016 on the X-T2, against Jan 2016 on the X-Pro2.
- Max resolution: 4K on the X-T2, against 1080p on the X-Pro2.
- Rear screen: 3", 1.62M dots on the X-Pro2, against 3", 1.04M dots on the X-T2.
- Weight (with battery): 495 g on the X-Pro2, against 507 g on the X-T2.
- Battery (CIPA shots): 340 on the X-T2, against 280 on the X-Pro2.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | Not priced in US yet | Not priced in US yet |
| Overview | ||
| Type | Mirrorless | Mirrorless |
| Announced | Jan 2016 | Jul 2016 (best) |
| US launch priceUS list price when announced, body only. Today's prices are in the offers table. | $1,699 | $1,599 |
| Lens | Interchangeable | Interchangeable |
| Sensor & image | ||
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor type | X-Trans CMOS III | X-Trans CMOS III |
| Resolution | 24.3 MP | 24.3 MP |
| Native ISO | 200–12,800 | 200–12,800 |
| In-body stabilisation | No | No |
| Speed & autofocus | ||
| Burst (mechanical) | 8 fps | 8 fps |
| Burst (electronic) | — | 14 fps |
| Fastest shutter (mech.) | 1/8,000s | 1/8,000s |
| Fastest shutter (elec.) | 1/32,000s | 1/32,000s |
| AF pointsMakers count points differently, so this is not ranked. | 325 | 325 |
| Subject detectionMakers group subjects differently (Canon's "animal" includes birds), so only having it is ranked. | Human | Human |
| Video | ||
| Max resolution | 1080p | 4K (best) |
| 4K frame rate | — | 30p |
| 10-bit internal | No | No |
| Internal raw video | No | No |
| Mic input | Yes | Yes |
| Headphone jack | No | No |
| Viewfinder & screen | ||
| Viewfinder | Hybrid optical/EVF, 2.36M dots | Electronic, 2.36M dots |
| Rear screen | 3", 1.62M dots (best) | 3", 1.04M dots |
| Screen articulation | Fixed | Multi-angle (tilt + flip) |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Body & battery | ||
| Weight (with battery) | 495 g (best) | 507 g |
| Dimensions (W×H×D) | 140.5 × 82.8 × 45.9 mm | 132.5 × 91.8 × 49.2 mm |
| Weather sealed | Yes | Yes |
| Battery (CIPA shots) | 280 | 340 (best) |
| Card slots | 2 · SD UHS-II + SD UHS-I | 2 · SD UHS-II + SD UHS-II |
| USB-C | No | No |
| Built-in flash | No | No |
| Wi-Fi / Bluetooth | Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.
Low light & noise
X-Pro2
3.9 µm pixels
24.3 MP on a aps-c sensor, ISO up to 12,800
X-T2
3.9 µm pixels
24.3 MP on a aps-c sensor, ISO up to 12,800
Bigger pixels gather more light each, so they tend to show less noise at high ISO, but sensor design matters as much. For real noise at ISO 6400, these sites measure it:
- Photons to Photos: dynamic range vs ISO ↗Photographic dynamic range measured at every ISO, bodies on one chart
- Photons to Photos: noise vs ISO ↗Read noise at every ISO from lab tests: lower is cleaner in the shadows
- DPReview studio scene ↗The same scene shot by each camera at the ISO you pick, side by side
- DPReview reviews ↗Full reviews with high-ISO samples
- Low-light video tests ↗Real-world high-ISO footage on YouTube
Size, to scale
Front (width × height)
Top (width × depth)