Fujifilm X-M5 vs OM System PEN
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Announced: Sep 2026 on the PEN, against Oct 2024 on the X-M5.
- Sensor size: APS-C on the X-M5, against Micro Four Thirds on the PEN.
- Resolution: 26.1 MP on the X-M5, against 20.4 MP on the PEN.
- Native ISO: 200–25,600 on the PEN, against 160–12,800 on the X-M5.
- In-body stabilisation: Yes, 5.5 stops on the PEN, against No on the X-M5.
- Max resolution: 6.2K on the X-M5, against 4K on the PEN.
X-M5 or PEN: which should you buy?
Choose the X-M5 for its sensor size, resolution, max resolution and 4K frame rate. It leads on 6 specs in all.
Choose the PEN for its native ISO, in-body stabilisation, viewfinder and weather sealed. It leads on 5 specs in all.
On paper the X-M5 wins more rows (6 to 5); if the PEN's strengths are the ones you shoot with, and its price is lower where you buy, it can still be the better buy.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | $899 new | $999.99 new |
| Overview | ||
| Type | Mirrorless | Mirrorless |
| Announced | Oct 2024 | Sep 2026 (best) |
| US launch priceUS list price when announced, body only. Today's prices are in the offers table. | $799 | $999.99 |
| Lens | Interchangeable | Interchangeable |
| Sensor & image | ||
| Sensor size | APS-C (best) | Micro Four Thirds |
| Sensor type | X-Trans CMOS 4 | Live MOS |
| Resolution | 26.1 MP (best) | 20.4 MP |
| Native ISO | 160–12,800 | 200–25,600 (best) |
| In-body stabilisation | No | Yes, 5.5 stops (best) |
| Speed & autofocus | ||
| Burst (mechanical) | 8 fps | — |
| Burst (electronic) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Fastest shutter (mech.) | 1/4,000s | — |
| Fastest shutter (elec.) | 1/32,000s | — |
| AF pointsMakers count points differently, so this is not ranked. | 425 | 121 |
| Subject detectionMakers group subjects differently (Canon's "animal" includes birds), so only having it is ranked. | Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle, Aircraft, Train | Human, Animal |
| Video | ||
| Max resolution | 6.2K (best) | 4K |
| 4K frame rate | 60p (best) | 30p |
| 10-bit internal | Yes | — |
| Internal raw video | No | No |
| Mic input | Yes | Yes |
| Headphone jack | Yes (best) | No |
| Viewfinder & screen | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic, 2.36M dots (best) |
| Rear screen | 3", 1.04M dots | 3", 1.04M dots |
| Screen articulation | Fully articulating | Fully articulating |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Body & battery | ||
| Weight (with battery) | 355 g (best) | 393 g |
| Dimensions (W×H×D) | 111.9 × 66.6 × 38 mm | 125.8 × 74.5 × 43.3 mm |
| Weather sealed | No | Yes (best) |
| Battery (CIPA shots) | 330 | 410 (best) |
| Card slots | 1 · SD UHS-I | 1 · SD UHS-I |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in flash | No | No |
| Wi-Fi / Bluetooth | Wi-Fi + Bluetooth | Wi-Fi + Bluetooth |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.
Price history: is the newer one cheaper?
Low light & noise
X-M5
3.8 µm pixels
26.1 MP on a aps-c sensor, ISO up to 12,800
PEN
3.3 µm pixels
20.4 MP on a micro four thirds sensor, ISO up to 25,600
Bigger pixels gather more light each, so they tend to show less noise at high ISO, but sensor design matters as much. For real noise at ISO 6400, these sites measure it:
- Photons to Photos: dynamic range vs ISO ↗Photographic dynamic range measured at every ISO, bodies on one chart
- Photons to Photos: noise vs ISO ↗Read noise at every ISO from lab tests: lower is cleaner in the shadows
- DPReview studio scene ↗The same scene shot by each camera at the ISO you pick, side by side
- DPReview reviews ↗Full reviews with high-ISO samples
- Low-light video tests ↗Real-world high-ISO footage on YouTube
Size, to scale
Front (width × height)
Top (width × depth)