Fujifilm X-H2S vs OM System OM-1
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Announced: May 2022 on the X-H2S, against Feb 2022 on the OM-1.
- Sensor size: APS-C on the X-H2S, against Micro Four Thirds on the OM-1.
- Resolution: 26.2 MP on the X-H2S, against 20.4 MP on the OM-1.
- Native ISO: 200–102,400 on the OM-1, against 160–12,800 on the X-H2S.
- In-body stabilisation: Yes, 8 stops on the OM-1, against Yes, 7 stops on the X-H2S.
- Burst (mechanical): 15 fps on the X-H2S, against 10 fps on the OM-1.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | $2,899.95 new | $1,999.95 new |
| Overview | ||
| Type | Mirrorless | Mirrorless |
| Announced | May 2022 (best) | Feb 2022 |
| US launch priceUS list price when announced, body only. Today's prices are in the offers table. | $2,499 | $2,199.99 |
| Lens | Interchangeable | Interchangeable |
| Sensor & image | ||
| Sensor size | APS-C (best) | Micro Four Thirds |
| Sensor type | X-Trans CMOS 5 HS (stacked) | Stacked BSI Live MOS |
| Resolution | 26.2 MP (best) | 20.4 MP |
| Native ISO | 160–12,800 | 200–102,400 (best) |
| In-body stabilisation | Yes, 7 stops | Yes, 8 stops (best) |
| Speed & autofocus | ||
| Burst (mechanical) | 15 fps (best) | 10 fps |
| Burst (electronic) | 40 fps | 120 fps (best) |
| Fastest shutter (mech.) | 1/8,000s | 1/8,000s |
| Fastest shutter (elec.) | 1/32,000s | 1/32,000s |
| AF pointsMakers count points differently, so this is not ranked. | 425 | 1,053 |
| Subject detectionMakers group subjects differently (Canon's "animal" includes birds), so only having it is ranked. | Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle, Aircraft, Train | Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle, Aircraft, Train |
| Video | ||
| Max resolution | 6.2K (best) | 4K |
| 4K frame rate | 120p (best) | 60p |
| 10-bit internal | Yes | Yes |
| Internal raw video | No | No |
| Mic input | Yes | Yes |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Viewfinder & screen | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic, 5.76M dots | Electronic, 5.76M dots |
| Rear screen | 3", 1.62M dots | 3", 1.62M dots |
| Screen articulation | Fully articulating | Fully articulating |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Body & battery | ||
| Weight (with battery) | 660 g | 599 g (best) |
| Dimensions (W×H×D) | 136.3 × 92.9 × 84.6 mm | 134.8 × 91.6 × 72.7 mm |
| Weather sealed | Yes | Yes |
| Battery (CIPA shots) | 580 (best) | 520 |
| Card slots | 2 · CFexpress B + SD UHS-II | 2 · SD UHS-II + SD UHS-II |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in flash | No | No |
| Wi-Fi / Bluetooth | Wi-Fi + Bluetooth | Wi-Fi + Bluetooth |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.
Low light & noise
X-H2S
3.8 µm pixels
26.16 MP on a aps-c sensor, ISO up to 12,800
OM-1
3.3 µm pixels
20.4 MP on a micro four thirds sensor, ISO up to 102,400
Bigger pixels gather more light each, so they tend to show less noise at high ISO, but sensor design matters as much. For real noise at ISO 6400, these sites measure it:
- Photons to Photos: dynamic range vs ISO ↗Photographic dynamic range measured at every ISO, bodies on one chart
- Photons to Photos: noise vs ISO ↗Read noise at every ISO from lab tests: lower is cleaner in the shadows
- DPReview studio scene ↗The same scene shot by each camera at the ISO you pick, side by side
- DPReview reviews ↗Full reviews with high-ISO samples
- Low-light video tests ↗Real-world high-ISO footage on YouTube
Size, to scale
Front (width × height)
Top (width × depth)