Fujifilm GFX 50R vs Hasselblad X1D-50c
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Announced: Sep 2018 on the GFX 50R, against Jun 2016 on the X1D-50c.
- Resolution: 51.4 MP on the GFX 50R, against 50 MP on the X1D-50c.
- Native ISO: 100–25,600 on the X1D-50c, against 100–12,800 on the GFX 50R.
- Burst (mechanical): 3 fps on the GFX 50R, against 2.3 fps on the X1D-50c.
- Fastest shutter (mech.): 1/4,000s on the GFX 50R, against 1/2,000s on the X1D-50c.
- Headphone jack: Yes on the X1D-50c, against No on the GFX 50R.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | Not priced in US yet | Not priced in US yet |
| Overview | ||
| Type | Medium format | Medium format |
| Announced | Sep 2018 (best) | Jun 2016 |
| US launch priceUS list price when announced, body only. Today's prices are in the offers table. | $4,499.95 | $8,995 |
| Lens | Interchangeable | Interchangeable |
| Sensor & image | ||
| Sensor size | Medium format | Medium format |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Resolution | 51.4 MP (best) | 50 MP |
| Native ISO | 100–12,800 | 100–25,600 (best) |
| In-body stabilisation | No | No |
| Speed & autofocus | ||
| Burst (mechanical) | 3 fps (best) | 2.3 fps |
| Burst (electronic) | — | — |
| Fastest shutter (mech.) | 1/4,000s (best) | 1/2,000s |
| Fastest shutter (elec.) | 1/16,000s | — |
| AF pointsMakers count points differently, so this is not ranked. | 425 | — |
| Subject detectionMakers group subjects differently (Canon's "animal" includes birds), so only having it is ranked. | Human | — |
| Video | ||
| Max resolution | 1080p | 1080p |
| 4K frame rate | — | — |
| 10-bit internal | No | — |
| Internal raw video | No | No |
| Mic input | Yes | Yes |
| Headphone jack | No | Yes (best) |
| Viewfinder & screen | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic, 3.69M dots (best) | Electronic, 2.36M dots |
| Rear screen | 3.2", 2.36M dots (best) | 3", 0.92M dots |
| Screen articulation | Tilting | Fixed |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Body & battery | ||
| Weight (with battery) | 775 g | 725 g (best) |
| Dimensions (W×H×D) | 160.7 × 96.5 × 66.4 mm | — |
| Weather sealed | Yes | Yes |
| Battery (CIPA shots) | 400 | — |
| Card slots | 2 · SD UHS-II + SD UHS-II | 2 · SD + SD |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in flash | No | No |
| Wi-Fi / Bluetooth | Wi-Fi + Bluetooth | Wi-Fi |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.
Low light & noise
GFX 50R
5.3 µm pixels
51.4 MP on a medium format sensor, ISO up to 12,800
X1D-50c
5.4 µm pixels
50 MP on a medium format sensor, ISO up to 25,600
Bigger pixels gather more light each, so they tend to show less noise at high ISO, but sensor design matters as much. For real noise at ISO 6400, these sites measure it:
- Photons to Photos: dynamic range vs ISO ↗Photographic dynamic range measured at every ISO, bodies on one chart
- Photons to Photos: noise vs ISO ↗Read noise at every ISO from lab tests: lower is cleaner in the shadows
- DPReview studio scene ↗The same scene shot by each camera at the ISO you pick, side by side
- DPReview reviews ↗Full reviews with high-ISO samples
- Low-light video tests ↗Real-world high-ISO footage on YouTube
Size, to scale
We don't have the maker's dimensions for the Hasselblad X1D-50c, so there's nothing to draw to scale.