Fujifilm GFX100S II vs Hasselblad X2D II 100C
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Announced: Aug 2025 on the X2D II 100C, against May 2024 on the GFX100S II.
- Resolution: 102 MP on the GFX100S II, against 100 MP on the X2D II 100C.
- Native ISO: 50–25,600 on the X2D II 100C, against 80–12,800 on the GFX100S II.
- In-body stabilisation: Yes, 10 stops on the X2D II 100C, against Yes, 8 stops on the GFX100S II.
- Burst (mechanical): 7 fps on the GFX100S II, against 3 fps on the X2D II 100C.
- Fastest shutter (elec.): 1/16,000s on the GFX100S II, against 1/6,000s on the X2D II 100C.
GFX100S II or X2D II 100C: which should you buy?
Choose the GFX100S II for its resolution, burst (mechanical), fastest shutter (elec.) and mic input. It leads on 7 specs in all.
Choose the X2D II 100C for its native ISO, in-body stabilisation and weight (with battery).
On paper the GFX100S II wins more rows (7 to 3); if the X2D II 100C's strengths are the ones you shoot with, and its price is lower where you buy, it can still be the better buy.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | $5,699 new | $7,799 new $7,829 used |
| Overview | ||
| Type | Medium format | Medium format |
| Announced | May 2024 | Aug 2025 (best) |
| US launch priceUS list price when announced, body only. Today's prices are in the offers table. | $4,999 | $7,399 |
| Lens | Interchangeable | Interchangeable |
| Sensor & image | ||
| Sensor size | Medium format | Medium format |
| Sensor type | BSI CMOS | BSI CMOS |
| Resolution | 102 MP (best) | 100 MP |
| Native ISO | 80–12,800 | 50–25,600 (best) |
| In-body stabilisation | Yes, 8 stops | Yes, 10 stops (best) |
| Speed & autofocus | ||
| Burst (mechanical) | 7 fps (best) | 3 fps |
| Burst (electronic) | 4.1 fps | — |
| Fastest shutter (mech.) | 1/4,000s | 1/4,000s |
| Fastest shutter (elec.) | 1/16,000s (best) | 1/6,000s |
| AF pointsMakers count points differently, so this is not ranked. | 425 | 425 |
| Subject detectionMakers group subjects differently (Canon's "animal" includes birds), so only having it is ranked. | Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle, Aircraft, Train | Human, Animal, Vehicle |
| Video | ||
| Max resolution | 4K | — |
| 4K frame rate | 30p | — |
| 10-bit internal | Yes | — |
| Internal raw video | No | — |
| Mic input | Yes (best) | No |
| Headphone jack | Yes (best) | No |
| Viewfinder & screen | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic, 5.76M dots | Electronic, 5.76M dots |
| Rear screen | 3.2", 2.36M dots | 3.6", 2.36M dots |
| Screen articulation | Multi-angle (tilt + flip) | Tilting |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Body & battery | ||
| Weight (with battery) | 883 g | 840 g (best) |
| Dimensions (W×H×D) | 150 × 104.2 × 87.2 mm | 148.5 × 106 × 75 mm |
| Weather sealed | Yes | — |
| Battery (CIPA shots) | 530 (best) | 327 |
| Card slots | 2 · SD UHS-II + SD UHS-II (best) | 1 · CFexpress B + 1TB internal SSD |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in flash | No | No |
| Wi-Fi / Bluetooth | Wi-Fi + Bluetooth | — |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.
Price history: is the newer one cheaper?
Low light & noise
GFX100S II
3.8 µm pixels
102 MP on a medium format sensor, ISO up to 12,800
X2D II 100C
3.8 µm pixels
100 MP on a medium format sensor, ISO up to 25,600
Bigger pixels gather more light each, so they tend to show less noise at high ISO, but sensor design matters as much. For real noise at ISO 6400, these sites measure it:
- Photons to Photos: dynamic range vs ISO ↗Photographic dynamic range measured at every ISO, bodies on one chart
- Photons to Photos: noise vs ISO ↗Read noise at every ISO from lab tests: lower is cleaner in the shadows
- DPReview studio scene ↗The same scene shot by each camera at the ISO you pick, side by side
- DPReview reviews ↗Full reviews with high-ISO samples
- Low-light video tests ↗Real-world high-ISO footage on YouTube
Size, to scale
Front (width × height)
Top (width × depth)