DJI Osmo Pocket 4 vs Insta360 Luna Pro
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Announced: Sep 2026 on the Luna Pro, against Apr 2026 on the Osmo Pocket 4.
- Resolution: 50 MP on the Luna Pro, against 37 MP on the Osmo Pocket 4.
- Native ISO: 50–12,800 on the Osmo Pocket 4, against 100–6,400 on the Luna Pro.
- Max resolution: 8K on the Luna Pro, against 4K on the Osmo Pocket 4.
- 4K frame rate: 240p on the Osmo Pocket 4, against 120p on the Luna Pro.
- Weight (with battery): 190.5 g on the Osmo Pocket 4, against 215 g on the Luna Pro.
Osmo Pocket 4 or Luna Pro: which should you buy?
Choose the Osmo Pocket 4 for its native ISO, 4K frame rate and weight (with battery).
Choose the Luna Pro for its resolution and max resolution.
On paper the Osmo Pocket 4 wins more rows (3 to 2); if the Luna Pro's strengths are the ones you shoot with, and its price is lower where you buy, it can still be the better buy.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | Not priced in US yet | $599.99 new |
| Overview | ||
| Type | Compact (fixed lens) | Compact (fixed lens) |
| Announced | Apr 2026 | Sep 2026 (best) |
| US launch priceUS list price when announced, body only. Today's prices are in the offers table. | — | $599.99 |
| Lens | 20mm (35mm eq.) f/2 | 20mm (35mm eq.) f/1.8 |
| Sensor & image | ||
| Sensor size | 1" | 1" |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Resolution | 37 MP | 50 MP (best) |
| Native ISO | 50–12,800 (best) | 100–6,400 |
| In-body stabilisation | No | No |
| Speed & autofocus | ||
| Burst (mechanical) | — | — |
| Burst (electronic) | — | — |
| Fastest shutter (mech.) | — | — |
| Fastest shutter (elec.) | 1/8,000s | 1/8,000s |
| AF pointsMakers count points differently, so this is not ranked. | — | — |
| Subject detectionMakers group subjects differently (Canon's "animal" includes birds), so only having it is ranked. | — | — |
| Video | ||
| Max resolution | 4K | 8K (best) |
| 4K frame rate | 240p (best) | 120p |
| 10-bit internal | — | Yes |
| Internal raw video | No | No |
| Mic input | No | No |
| Headphone jack | No | No |
| Viewfinder & screen | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Rear screen | 2" | 2" |
| Screen articulation | Fixed | Fixed |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Body & battery | ||
| Weight (with battery) | 190.5 g (best) | 215 g |
| Dimensions (W×H×D) | 44.4 × 144.2 × 33.5 mm | 52.78 × 155.7 × 38.47 mm |
| Weather sealed | — | No |
| Battery (CIPA shots) | — | — |
| Card slots | 1 · microSD | 1 · microSD + 47GB internal |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in flash | No | No |
| Wi-Fi / Bluetooth | Wi-Fi + Bluetooth | Wi-Fi + Bluetooth |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.
Price history: is the newer one cheaper?
Low light & noise
Osmo Pocket 4
1.8 µm pixels
37 MP on a 1" sensor, ISO up to 12,800
Luna Pro
1.5 µm pixels
50 MP on a 1" sensor, ISO up to 6,400
Bigger pixels gather more light each, so they tend to show less noise at high ISO, but sensor design matters as much. For real noise at ISO 6400, these sites measure it:
- Photons to Photos: dynamic range vs ISO ↗Photographic dynamic range measured at every ISO, bodies on one chart
- Photons to Photos: noise vs ISO ↗Read noise at every ISO from lab tests: lower is cleaner in the shadows
- DPReview studio scene ↗The same scene shot by each camera at the ISO you pick, side by side
- DPReview reviews ↗Full reviews with high-ISO samples
- Low-light video tests ↗Real-world high-ISO footage on YouTube
Size, to scale
Front (width × height)
Top (width × depth)