DJI Osmo 360 II vs Insta360 X5
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Announced: Aug 2026 on the Osmo 360 II, against Apr 2025 on the X5.
- Sensor size: 1/1.1" on the Osmo 360 II, against 1/1.28" on the X5.
- Resolution: 120 MP on the Osmo 360 II, against 72 MP on the X5.
- Native ISO: 100–51,200 on the Osmo 360 II, against 100–6,400 on the X5.
- 10-bit internal: Yes on the Osmo 360 II, against No on the X5.
- Weight (with battery): 183 g on the Osmo 360 II, against 200 g on the X5.
Osmo 360 II or X5: which should you buy?
Choose the Osmo 360 II for its sensor size, resolution, native ISO and 10-bit internal. It leads on 5 specs in all.
Choose the X5 for its waterproof.
On paper the Osmo 360 II wins more rows (5 to 1); if the X5's strengths are the ones you shoot with, and its price is lower where you buy, it can still be the better buy.
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | $549 new | $549 new |
| Overview | ||
| Type | 360° camera | 360° camera |
| Announced | Aug 2026 (best) | Apr 2025 |
| US launch priceUS list price when announced, body only. Today's prices are in the offers table. | — | $549.99 |
| Lens | f/1.9 | f/2 |
| Sensor & image | ||
| Sensor size | 1/1.1" (best) | 1/1.28" |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Resolution | 120 MP (best) | 72 MP |
| Native ISO | 100–51,200 (best) | 100–6,400 |
| In-body stabilisation | No | No |
| Speed & autofocus | ||
| Burst (mechanical) | — | — |
| Burst (electronic) | — | — |
| Fastest shutter (mech.) | — | — |
| Fastest shutter (elec.) | 1/8,000s | 1/8,000s |
| AF pointsMakers count points differently, so this is not ranked. | — | — |
| Subject detectionMakers group subjects differently (Canon's "animal" includes birds), so only having it is ranked. | None | None |
| Video | ||
| Max resolution | 8K | 8K |
| 4K frame rate | 120p | 120p |
| 10-bit internal | Yes (best) | No |
| Internal raw video | No | No |
| Mic input | No | No |
| Headphone jack | No | No |
| Viewfinder & screen | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Rear screen | 2" | 2.5" |
| Screen articulation | Fixed | Fixed |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Body & battery | ||
| Weight (with battery) | 183 g (best) | 200 g |
| Dimensions (W×H×D) | 61 × 81 × 36.3 mm | 46 × 124.5 × 38.2 mm |
| Weather sealed | Yes | Yes |
| Battery (CIPA shots) | — | — |
| Waterproof | 10 m | 15 m (best) |
| Card slots | 1 · microSD | 1 · microSD UHS-I |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in flash | No | No |
| Wi-Fi / Bluetooth | Wi-Fi + Bluetooth | Wi-Fi + Bluetooth |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.
Price history: is the newer one cheaper?
Low light & noise
Osmo 360 II
0.9 µm pixels
120 MP on a 1/1.1" sensor, ISO up to 51,200
X5
1.0 µm pixels
72 MP on a 1/1.28" sensor, ISO up to 6,400
Bigger pixels gather more light each, so they tend to show less noise at high ISO, but sensor design matters as much. For real noise at ISO 6400, these sites measure it:
- Photons to Photos: dynamic range vs ISO ↗Photographic dynamic range measured at every ISO, bodies on one chart
- Photons to Photos: noise vs ISO ↗Read noise at every ISO from lab tests: lower is cleaner in the shadows
- DPReview studio scene ↗The same scene shot by each camera at the ISO you pick, side by side
- DPReview reviews ↗Full reviews with high-ISO samples
- Low-light video tests ↗Real-world high-ISO footage on YouTube
Size, to scale
Front (width × height)
Top (width × depth)

