Canon EOS R6 Mark III vs Panasonic Lumix S1 II
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Announced: Nov 2025 on the EOS R6 Mark III, against May 2025 on the Lumix S1 II.
- Resolution: 32.5 MP on the EOS R6 Mark III, against 24.1 MP on the Lumix S1 II.
- Native ISO: 100–64,000 on the EOS R6 Mark III, against 100–51,200 on the Lumix S1 II.
- In-body stabilisation: Yes, 8.5 stops on the EOS R6 Mark III, against Yes, 8 stops on the Lumix S1 II.
- Burst (mechanical): 12 fps on the EOS R6 Mark III, against 10 fps on the Lumix S1 II.
- Burst (electronic): 70 fps on the Lumix S1 II, against 40 fps on the EOS R6 Mark III.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | $2,799 new $2,518.95 used | $2,897.99 new |
| Overview | ||
| Type | Mirrorless | Mirrorless |
| Announced | Nov 2025 (best) | May 2025 |
| US launch priceUS list price when announced, body only. Today's prices are in the offers table. | $2,799 | $3,199 |
| Lens | Interchangeable | Interchangeable |
| Sensor & image | ||
| Sensor size | Full frame | Full frame |
| Sensor type | CMOS | Partially stacked CMOS |
| Resolution | 32.5 MP (best) | 24.1 MP |
| Native ISO | 100–64,000 (best) | 100–51,200 |
| In-body stabilisation | Yes, 8.5 stops (best) | Yes, 8 stops |
| Speed & autofocus | ||
| Burst (mechanical) | 12 fps (best) | 10 fps |
| Burst (electronic) | 40 fps | 70 fps (best) |
| Fastest shutter (mech.) | 1/8,000s | 1/8,000s |
| Fastest shutter (elec.) | 1/16,000s | 1/16,000s |
| AF pointsMakers count points differently, so this is not ranked. | 1,053 | 779 |
| Subject detectionMakers group subjects differently (Canon's "animal" includes birds), so only having it is ranked. | Human, Animal, Vehicle | Human, Animal, Vehicle |
| Video | ||
| Max resolution | 7K (best) | 6K |
| 4K frame rate | 120p | 120p |
| 10-bit internal | Yes | Yes |
| Internal raw video | Yes | Yes |
| Mic input | Yes | Yes |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Viewfinder & screen | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic, 3.69M dots | Electronic, 5.76M dots (best) |
| Rear screen | 3", 1.62M dots | 3", 1.84M dots (best) |
| Screen articulation | Fully articulating | Multi-angle (tilt + flip) |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Body & battery | ||
| Weight (with battery) | 699 g (best) | 800 g |
| Dimensions (W×H×D) | 138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm | 134.3 × 102.3 × 91.8 mm |
| Weather sealed | Yes | Yes |
| Battery (CIPA shots) | — | 350 |
| Card slots | 2 · CFexpress B + SD UHS-II | 2 · CFexpress B + SD UHS-II |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in flash | No | No |
| Wi-Fi / Bluetooth | Wi-Fi + Bluetooth | Wi-Fi + Bluetooth |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.
Low light & noise
EOS R6 Mark III
5.2 µm pixels
32.5 MP on a full frame sensor, ISO up to 64,000
Lumix S1 II
6.0 µm pixels
24.1 MP on a full frame sensor, ISO up to 51,200
Bigger pixels gather more light each, so they tend to show less noise at high ISO, but sensor design matters as much. For real noise at ISO 6400, these sites measure it:
- Photons to Photos: dynamic range vs ISO ↗Photographic dynamic range measured at every ISO, bodies on one chart
- Photons to Photos: noise vs ISO ↗Read noise at every ISO from lab tests: lower is cleaner in the shadows
- DPReview studio scene ↗The same scene shot by each camera at the ISO you pick, side by side
- DPReview reviews ↗Full reviews with high-ISO samples
- Low-light video tests ↗Real-world high-ISO footage on YouTube
Size, to scale
Front (width × height)
Top (width × depth)