Canon EOS R10 vs Fujifilm X-T30 II
Every published spec side by side, with today's lowest prices for the market you've chosen.
Key differences
- Announced: May 2022 on the EOS R10, against Sep 2021 on the X-T30 II.
- Resolution: 26.1 MP on the X-T30 II, against 24.2 MP on the EOS R10.
- Native ISO: 100–32,000 on the EOS R10, against 160–12,800 on the X-T30 II.
- Burst (mechanical): 15 fps on the EOS R10, against 8 fps on the X-T30 II.
- Burst (electronic): 30 fps on the X-T30 II, against 23 fps on the EOS R10.
- Fastest shutter (elec.): 1/32,000s on the X-T30 II, against 1/16,000s on the EOS R10.
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price today | $1,099 new | Not priced in US yet |
| Overview | ||
| Type | Mirrorless | Mirrorless |
| Announced | May 2022 (best) | Sep 2021 |
| US launch priceUS list price when announced, body only. Today's prices are in the offers table. | $979.99 | $899 |
| Lens | Interchangeable | Interchangeable |
| Sensor & image | ||
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor type | CMOS | X-Trans CMOS 4 |
| Resolution | 24.2 MP | 26.1 MP (best) |
| Native ISO | 100–32,000 (best) | 160–12,800 |
| In-body stabilisation | No | No |
| Speed & autofocus | ||
| Burst (mechanical) | 15 fps (best) | 8 fps |
| Burst (electronic) | 23 fps | 30 fps (best) |
| Fastest shutter (mech.) | 1/4,000s | 1/4,000s |
| Fastest shutter (elec.) | 1/16,000s | 1/32,000s (best) |
| AF pointsMakers count points differently, so this is not ranked. | 651 | 425 |
| Subject detectionMakers group subjects differently (Canon's "animal" includes birds), so only having it is ranked. | Human, Animal, Vehicle | Human |
| Video | ||
| Max resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate | 60p (best) | 30p |
| 10-bit internal | Yes (best) | No |
| Internal raw video | No | No |
| Mic input | Yes | Yes |
| Headphone jack | No | No |
| Viewfinder & screen | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic, 2.36M dots | Electronic, 2.36M dots |
| Rear screen | 3", 1.04M dots | 3", 1.62M dots (best) |
| Screen articulation | Fully articulating | Tilting |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Body & battery | ||
| Weight (with battery) | 429 g | 378 g (best) |
| Dimensions (W×H×D) | 122.5 × 87.8 × 83.4 mm | 118.4 × 82.8 × 46.8 mm |
| Weather sealed | No | No |
| Battery (CIPA shots) | — | 390 |
| Card slots | 1 · SD UHS-II | 1 · SD UHS-I |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in flash | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi / Bluetooth | Wi-Fi + Bluetooth | Wi-Fi + Bluetooth |
Green marks the better figure where “better” is unambiguous. A dash means the maker doesn't publish it or we haven't verified it yet.
Low light & noise
EOS R10
3.9 µm pixels
24.2 MP on a aps-c sensor, ISO up to 32,000
X-T30 II
3.8 µm pixels
26.1 MP on a aps-c sensor, ISO up to 12,800
Bigger pixels gather more light each, so they tend to show less noise at high ISO, but sensor design matters as much. For real noise at ISO 6400, these sites measure it:
- Photons to Photos: dynamic range vs ISO ↗Photographic dynamic range measured at every ISO, bodies on one chart
- Photons to Photos: noise vs ISO ↗Read noise at every ISO from lab tests: lower is cleaner in the shadows
- DPReview studio scene ↗The same scene shot by each camera at the ISO you pick, side by side
- DPReview reviews ↗Full reviews with high-ISO samples
- Low-light video tests ↗Real-world high-ISO footage on YouTube
Size, to scale
Front (width × height)
Top (width × depth)

